http://caddy.osiris-web.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ABoffo_%28Concept%29Talk:Boffo (Concept) - Revision history2026-05-03T18:11:16ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.41.1http://caddy.osiris-web.com/index.php?title=Talk:Boffo_(Concept)&diff=9492&oldid=prevOsiris: 1 revision: Talk Namespace2012-12-26T03:15:45Z<p>1 revision: Talk Namespace</p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 03:15, 26 December 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="4" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mediawiki:diff:1.41:old-9491:rev-9492 -->
</table>Osirishttp://caddy.osiris-web.com/index.php?title=Talk:Boffo_(Concept)&diff=9491&oldid=prevOld Dickens at 22:51, 6 November 20092009-11-06T22:51:54Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I seriously can't tell the difference between this and headology. I just thought "boffo" was miss Treasons word for it. Do we really need a seperate article, or should we merge it with headology?<br />
<br />
The difference is that Boffo is one example of Headology that has its own name. The articles link to each other; why not be able to look up whichever word you need? Lots of articles could be merged into general discussions, but why? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 22:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)</div>Old Dickens