Talk:1989 UC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision: Talk Namespace) |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:It's due to the categorisation, so it's not empty strictly speaking. We should avoid to add a category to empty articles though, it's silly. --[[User:Sanity|Sanity]] 17:43, 17 August 2007 (CEST) | :It's due to the categorisation, so it's not empty strictly speaking. We should avoid to add a category to empty articles though, it's silly. --[[User:Sanity|Sanity]] 17:43, 17 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
==What Rat?== | |||
Where does the Century of the Rat come from? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 05:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)<BR> | |||
I suspect from the not-too-reliable opinion of Doc Pseudopolis in {{FOC}}. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 20:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:06, 2 February 2018
What's the point of having an empty article for a year? Kellyterryjones 03:07, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
Hi Kellyterryjones.
I wondered this too... part of the solution might be if you go to the article and click on "What links here" to the bottom left.
This takes you to Young Sam Vimes where the significance of the year is revealed... although why it should have been set up as an empty article I don't know. --AgProv 23:52, 5 August 2007 (CEST)
- It's due to the categorisation, so it's not empty strictly speaking. We should avoid to add a category to empty articles though, it's silly. --Sanity 17:43, 17 August 2007 (CEST)
What Rat?
Where does the Century of the Rat come from? --Old Dickens (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I suspect from the not-too-reliable opinion of Doc Pseudopolis in Feet of Clay. --Old Dickens (talk) 20:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)