Talk:Widdershin Gate: Difference between revisions
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Small problem: Possibilities?) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
So should we delete this entry, or make an amendment to the effect that this was "right" for the {{COM}}, but the gate has since been renamed, see here? [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 14:14, 9 December 2012 (PST) | So should we delete this entry, or make an amendment to the effect that this was "right" for the {{COM}}, but the gate has since been renamed, see here? [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 14:14, 9 December 2012 (PST) | ||
:I'd say re-write it to say that no gate of that name exists now; it may have been a local name for one of the city gates to widdershins. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 14:51, 9 December 2012 (PST) | :I'd say re-write it to say that no gate of that name exists now; it may have been a local name for one of the city gates to widdershins. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 14:51, 9 December 2012 (PST) | ||
It is also concivable that the gate may no longer exist. I can think of several possible reasons for this: 1. Possibly destroyed in the fire in The Colour of Magic / any other of the city's fire/flood combinations, 2. The city has expanded past where the gate stood and thus it has been removed / forgotten, or is simply no longer considered important enough to be named, or 3. The gate has been dismantled. It is mentioned in on least one occasion (I forget where) that residents of the city frequently take the bricks that make up the wall so that they can use them for building materials, it is not inconceivable that over time the gate simply ceased to exist. --[[User:Zdm|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm|talk]]) 22:04, 9 December 2012 (PST) |
Revision as of 06:04, 10 December 2012
Small problem
Nothing called the "Widdershin Gate" is marked on the updated city map. I have gone back to the original SAM but there is no trace of a Widdershin Gate here either. The The Discworld Companion and The New Discworld Companion do not list it.
I am wondering, as this is a reference from the very first Discworld book where a lot of references were not fully formed, if this was later renamed. "Deosil" (Turnwise?) is the opposite direction to "widdershins". The gate directly opposite to the Deosil Gate was left un-named on the original The Streets of Ankh-Morpork. you might expect this to be the Widdershin Gate, but in the updated map, this has been renamed the Trading Gate. COM, if I recall rightly, said that Rincewind and Twoflower, on the night of the Great Fire, left the city with every intention of going to Chirm. This would have involved leaving by a gate on the Chirm-wards side of the City, and you could make a case for this being the Trading Gate (Widdershins Gate?)
So should we delete this entry, or make an amendment to the effect that this was "right" for the The Colour of Magic, but the gate has since been renamed, see here? AgProv (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2012 (PST)
- I'd say re-write it to say that no gate of that name exists now; it may have been a local name for one of the city gates to widdershins. --Old Dickens (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2012 (PST)
It is also concivable that the gate may no longer exist. I can think of several possible reasons for this: 1. Possibly destroyed in the fire in The Colour of Magic / any other of the city's fire/flood combinations, 2. The city has expanded past where the gate stood and thus it has been removed / forgotten, or is simply no longer considered important enough to be named, or 3. The gate has been dismantled. It is mentioned in on least one occasion (I forget where) that residents of the city frequently take the bricks that make up the wall so that they can use them for building materials, it is not inconceivable that over time the gate simply ceased to exist. --Zdm (talk) 22:04, 9 December 2012 (PST)