Talk:Imps

Imps in Dis-Organizers

The link Dis-Organizer is red, though there is an article called Dis-organiser. I'm not really sure about the spelling, but someone surer than me might want to correct the page that needs correcting :) And maybe merge some of the information on these two pages?

There are no two pages. The link is case-sensitive, so the question should be: should it be a capital O or shouldn't it? --Sanity 23:16, 7 November 2006 (CET)

Sorry, I was unclear - when I said "two pages" I meant the Dis-organiser article and this one, Imps. The information on them are somewhat overlapping. Annaxt 12:37, 8 November 2006 (CET)

Everybody is free to modify the information, there's no problem merging/splitting bits if necessary. So go ahead! :) I've just modified a few broken links on both pages, such as the capital O in Dis-Organizer. --Sanity 12:59, 8 November 2006 (CET)

But there's still the "z". --Old Dickens 16:14, 8 November 2006 (CET)

Surely that's the correct spelling though? After all, I did it as an english spelling. And regardsing the overlap, surely all its fine, because we can't give an accurate description of an imp without mentioning the disorganiser... --CommanderJake, AMCW 21:43, 8 November 2006 (CET)

Hmmm...the Corgi edition of Jingo spells it "ize" (odd for an English writer.) However, I notice the "Dis-organiser" article was written by one Commander Jake, AMCW, so maybe you should choose. ..--Old Dickens 03:25, 9 November 2006 (CET)

Just a note to say that I removed the link brackets around "Dis-Organizer" in the original comment. The wiki has organised (hah) around the spelling "Dis-organiser," but Dis-Organizer was still showing up on the "Pages needed" list. Carry on. Icb0005 (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)