Talk:Stinky: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --[[User:Prime.mover|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover|talk]]) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC) | I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --[[User:Prime.mover|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover|talk]]) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
:That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC) | :That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 June 2018
I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --that's wot I '''sed''' ... (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- How's that? --that's wot I '''sed''' ... (talk) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Fine by me. It seems to need the Stub until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)