Talk:Stinky

I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --that's wot I '''sed''' ... (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

How's that? --that's wot I '''sed''' ... (talk) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Fine by me. It seems to need the Stub until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Ah. Just saw this talk page comment. I agree there's supernatural thingies involved here; I don't see explanations in the canon. I guess I'd still call this a reasonable article for a minor character, at least reasonable enough not to call it a stub. But I will not argue, complain, or even send a meaningful Glance in the direction of anyone who puts the stub tag back in!  :-) Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 01:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)