Talk:Stinky: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(I *think* it's not a stub, but now I've read this talk page...) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC) | ::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
:Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC) | :Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Ah. Just saw this talk page comment. I agree there's supernatural thingies involved here; I don't see explanations in the canon. I guess I'd still call this a reasonable article for a minor character, at least reasonable enough not to call it a stub. But I will not argue, complain, or even send a meaningful Glance in the direction of anyone who puts the stub tag back in! :-) [[User:Moishe Rosenbaum|Moishe Rosenbaum]] ([[User talk:Moishe Rosenbaum|talk]]) 01:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:55, 18 February 2025
I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --that's wot I '''sed''' ... (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- How's that? --that's wot I '''sed''' ... (talk) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Fine by me. It seems to need the Stub until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Ah. Just saw this talk page comment. I agree there's supernatural thingies involved here; I don't see explanations in the canon. I guess I'd still call this a reasonable article for a minor character, at least reasonable enough not to call it a stub. But I will not argue, complain, or even send a meaningful Glance in the direction of anyone who puts the stub tag back in! :-) Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 01:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)